The Santa Cruz Public Libraries VS. Faceitter

ryanwade's picture

The following blog post critically looks at the recent adoption of Facebook and Twitter by the Santa Cruz Public Libraries system, in Santa Cruz County, California.

Santa Cruz Public Libraries

Santa Cruz Public Libraries (SCPL) is the library system that serves the greater metropolitan area of Santa Cruz, Ca, a population of about 201,000 people. Their website, Santacruzpl.org, was re-launched within the past year (May, 2009), and with the new website the library has also branched out to its users with a Facebook and a Twitter page, linked from the bottom of their homepage. In fact, the library anounced its Facebook and Twitter presence just last month (Feburary, 9th, 2010). Along with Facebook and Twitter, the new library site also includes a blog written by the director of the system, Teresa Landers, that patrons are encouraged to comment on.

 

SCPL and Online Marketing

Aside from the director's blog on the SCPL website, the Web 2.0 use of SCPL, through its active use of Facebook and Twitter, seems to be an investment in marketing their current programming rather than an effort to engage communication with patrons or to better connect patrons with traditional library services, like easy access to the on-line catalog or branch locations and hours of operation, like is often the case with University library Facebook pages.

The library is still within its first month of activity on Facebook and Twitter, announcing on the SCPL website the launch of its Facebook and Twitter pages on the 9th of Feburary, 2010. Looking at their profiles on the two services, the library is actively posting on both sites. Here is some preliminary statistical data drawn from their accounts on their activity (as of 3/5/2010):

 

 

Date of first Post

Posts

Fans/Followers

Facebook

Feb. 3rd, 2010

26 + 1 “discussion” (27 total)

205

Twitter

Feb. 3rd, 2010

33

8

 

Because SCPL has not been using the technologies for very long, purely using the above statistics without the context of time to gauge their effectiveness would be unfair. But given that the library announced their Facebook and Twitter pages under a month ago, and all of the activity on the sites is no older than Feb. 3rd, the statistics are rather strong, and their presence on the pages is active, averaging approximately two posts per day and over 7 new fans/followers per day. A good start, but the library could be doing better, as we'll see. Using Howsociable.com Santa Cruz Public Libraries gets 201 Facebook Pages mentions and 183 Facebook Friends mentions.

 

Why Now?

With Facebook and Twitter the Santa Cruz Public Libraries system is attempting to market its programming to an on-line audience, which is a great idea at an apropos time, since funding for the system is greatly suffering and in return so are its services. Since much of the funding for the system comes from the general budget for the city and local tax measures, garnering support and usage of the library is--literally--its lifeblood. Without support, usage, and a population that values the library, the system cannot survive. In this way, new and creative ways for the library to market itself are integral to their success.

How are they doing it?

The library is working to better market itself, and while the effort is new I worry that their marketing is a case of “preaching to the choir”--marketing itself to people who already follow the library, use the library, and value the library, thus falling on moot ears and failing the capture the population who is not using the library. While Facebook and Twitter functionality can add value in this way, better and more effective usage could increase the library's presence and build their brand, thus better establishing itself as a valuable asset to the community.

Who might benefit? Reading through the posts on the two sites, SCPL seems to be falling short in appealing to the large tech savvy younger population of the metropolitan area, home to a university, a college, and various technology based companies and a large population that commutes daily to the Silicon Valley.

Personally, it is my view that the library has room to improve on their Facebook presence, and in the face of their newness, by having completely developed their Facebook page before launching it. By doing this the library could have better captured the audience they already have and at the same time made the page a more valuable outreach tool for the public. Currently, the Santa Cruz Public Libraries Facebook page includes no additional functionality above what Facebook provides, and as such the usage of the page is pretty much limited to announcements of upcoming programing. Twitter is also being used with the same methodology. Furthermore, by adding more features to the Facebook page, and then better marketing that technology through their website, users might be more inclined to use the library. Reviewing their Facebook and Twitter posts, the Santa Cruz Public Libraries looks like the stale old library system that it is, and as such they're missing a great opportunity to capture the attention of young and old like, and thus getting the usage and support that the library deserves.

 

What more could be done?

I've been using the Santa Cruz Public Libraries system since I moved to Santa Cruz in 2001, and as such I'd say that I'm fairly familiar with the library and their programming. When thinking about how I might improve the library's presence on Facebook and Twitter, I would start from the ground up. Firstly, I would look at the library and look at the community by answering this question:

Who is using the library and who is not?

Now take those two groups and see what comes up. The first group is easy and all we have to do there is increase functionality for them (for instance, developing a searchable catalog from Facebook, with information about their great—but no one knows about them—electronic collection). The second group is more difficult, but at the same time more exciting because it is limitless. The library needs to branch out. Here are some ideas (or idea-provoking-ideas) that could help the library better serve their patrons and branch out to new patrons:

  • Create a Facebook page within the group just for its extensive graphic novel collection.

  • Use a third party app to build virtual classrooms to link middle school and high school research projects with the schools and the library better (already students in the local schools have to use the library from research).

  • Use and IM client (even the one provided by Facebook) to give patrons easy on-line reference.

  • In short, identify users and potential users, create and develop valuable programing and functionality, and then use Facebook and Twitter to deliver that functionality.

But these are just some ideas. They could be implemented with success, or they could be used to inspire more creative thinking, and regardless of which action is prompted, the root issue is still being addressed, that if the library is going to adopt these technologies then they need to fully adopt, develop, and implement them if they want success. To half launch a Facebook and Twitter page is beyond a waste of time and money, its choosing to not use free technologies that can better serve and engage the population that the library is serving and trying to serve. If I sound overly critical it is only because I believe in the potential of Santa Cruz Public Libraries and believe that they can easily be doing more.

 

 

I especially liked your idea

michellekelleywalker's picture

I especially liked your idea to incorporate a solution that partners the public library with high school research projects.   As a high school librarian, I've often wondered why there is not a greater partnership between school and public librarians - I mean school-aged kids are a big part of their customer base too.  In fact, I wonder the same thing about academic librarians and why we (high school librarians) don't work with them to better prepare high schoolers for post-secondary learning and to be more proficient users of academic libraries.  I mean, that's the focus of our high school information literacy curriculum, but it's done on our own without partnering with other types of libraries.   Kudos to you for incorporating a bit of collaboration here between school and public in your recommendations.

This is an excellent

vickisteiner's picture

This is an excellent evaluation, Ryan! I especially liked your point about "preaching to the choir." It's nice to see the early success of SCPL's social media sites.

For a public library, I really liked your idea of having separate spaces for different user groups. That would be particularly important for kids and young adults in a public library community, I would think. It might also encourage young students to interact more on those sites if they didn't think that older users were reading their posts. 

Preplanning seems to be key

carlaavitabile's picture

Preplanning seems to be key when launching Facebook/twitter. Some of the weaker library Facebook pages definitely have a feel that not a lot of planning has gone into them. Regurgitating the events calendar is definitely not going to make a Facebook wall very interesting. From my point of view it only serves as you say to “preach to the choir.” Yes it is important to preach to the choir especially if the choir happens to be using Facebook more than going to destination websites, but in the case of a library it seems like Facebook should be dynamic and interesting enough to direct users to library services beyond a list of events. I think (agree) that adding more features will help with marketing the library’s brand. Promoting events is important but a library should be branding itself as an institution with more to offer than just events.

I really like your idea of creating pages within the group. Pages for the graphic novel collection could also direct patrons to the new book arrivals page (presuming there is one).

I am beginning to wonder if one of the problems with weak Facebook pages is that there is not enough time allotted for updating/creating content for Facebook. I get the impression from looking at the San Francisco Public Library Facebook pages that the person in charge has limited time (or interest). Especially since the posts on Facebook are the same as the posts on twitter. The postings are even on the same day.

Carla, I think that you post

ryanwade's picture

Carla, I think that you post and Michelle's post is hitting on the same topic--the money.  As they say about the USPS, overworked and underpaid.  I'm surprised that within all of the SFPL system that an Web 2.0 enthusiastic librarian can't be found, because I really think that if someone is excited about a project then they'll be able to find time for it.  I've worked in a lot of places and I've seen a lot of time doodled away.

As far as the highschool librarian goes, well, this might actually be the exception.  They might--as I've seen subbing in hs libraries--actually be so maxed that they don't have time to take on other projects.  Having a paraprofessional might help, but I really don't know what it would take.  It seems at a lot of the public libraries that I go to the reference desk has a lot of idle time--even is busy Seattle--and that idle time could be spent prepairing pathfinders for classes in the local HS.  It would be great.

Personally, working in that type of partnership is WHY I'm in library science school--that is my dream job.

Ryan

Syndicate content